So dinner at Ko, right? After all of the adrenal sweat that went into getting a reservation, was it worth it?
As capital F “Food”, it was all very good, sometimes great, and three times excellent. As capital D “Dining” it was decent value for money, but the beverage program is weak, the quarters verging on too tight, the allocation of space weird and the seats (unless you are blessed with impeccable posture) straight-up uncomfortable.
The best thing I ate was a spring pea soup with black trumpet mushrooms. The soup was sweet and smooth, not at all starchy as you might think such early peas might be. Also memorable was a dish of raw amaebi, tiny sweet shrimp, simple and creamy and vaguely briney. Pan seared scallops, cooked with a perfect crust that enclosed a buttery interior, sitting on bacon dashi, were also extraordinarily good.
What is remarkable about these being the most successful dishes is twofold: First, Ko has been identified as a working food lab of sorts, a sandbox for the Momofuku chefs, but the dishes that resonate the most with me were not terribly experimental. Second, the cook crush observed that the most successful food served was in the dishes that were the most refined, meaning, those that had been worked over and tweaked into a state of near-perfection. But upon reflection, I realized that two of the three best dishes were quickly developed specials, as according to the chef both the peas and the shrimp had arrived new to them that day. So how much refinement could actually be at play?
The lightly smoked, soft cooked egg (from the cook crush: “hen’s egg - just in case we thought it was a rooster’s egg”) served on soubise onions, topped with paddlefish caviar and garnished with tiny potato chips was refined in the sense of being well executed examples of each technique combined with elegant simplicity, but not anything challenging in terms of preparation or presentation.
Since the dinner I continue to marvel about the deep-fried shortribs, not so much because I want to eat them again, but because I’d like to know how they treat the meat to get it to be so completely different from its usual state. Short ribs are generally striated with fat and need to be cooked slowly in order to be tender (or sliced thinthinthin and grilled). These were dense meaty chunks. I think they must sous vide the ribs so that all of the fat and gelatin disperse through the meat, and then fry the resultant dense chunks. They were delicious and the texture was gorgeous.
One unique dish was the shaved fois gras over lychees, riesling jelly and pine nut brittle. It was very delicious and decadent, and I liked the textural weirdness of the grated fois, but as unique and tasty as it is, I did not like the presentation. A tiny quibble, maybe, and I realize that everyone else who has written about this dish has raved about it so this admission may expose me as a philistine, but the shaggy fois in the swooping dish seemed messy to me, and I had to hold the plate in place in order to get all the elements on my spoon at once. I liked the taste but I didn’t like eating it.
The desserts were clever - a high-falutin’ play on McDonald’s apple pie ingenously combined with toasted miso paste and sour ice cream, and a “cereal milk” panna cotta with home made cornflakes and chocolate - but I’m not a huge dessert girl, so I can’t really speak about how these compare to other hip Chef dessert acts. I’m happy with a bowl of simple ice cream.
The only real flaw in the evening was the beverage service. Agreeing to share, the cook crush opted for the $80 pairing and I for the $50 pairing, with the idea that we would get to taste more. Aside from the white beer served with the shortribs (mine), none of the pairings in anyway elevated the food presented. The pours were inconsistant and frankly, a little short. Generally the wine in the $80 pairing wasn’t better tasting or paired than the $50 pairing except one course when the pairing for each of us was from the same winemaker and my wine was notably inferior (and maybe not suitable for food). Wine doesn’t seem to be a core competency for the Momofuku gang, and that can be OK, as long as they don’t pretend that it is by offering costly pairings.
It was a great date. We ate very well and enjoyed sitting and watching the cooks finish presentations and try their hand at service. If in a couple of months someone has a reservation and asks me if I want to join, I’ll say yes. But it isn’t worth breaking a sweat for, and if I go again, I’m sticking with beer.